Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides a predictive tool for early and late outcomes in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine if cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) predicts 30-day and mid-term outcomes when assessing suitability for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Since July 2006 consecutive patients from a single centre identified with a large (≥5.5 cm) AAA were sent for CPET. Follow-up was completed on 1 August 2009. Univariate logistical regression was used to compare CPET parameters with the Detsky score, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Vascular Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (VPOSSUM) in predicting predefined early and late outcome measures. RESULTS: Full data were available for 102 patients (93% male, median age: 75 years, interquartile range (IQR): 70-80 years, median follow up: 28 months, IQR: 18-33 months). Ventilatory equivalents for oxygen and APACHE II predicted postoperative inotrope requirement (p=0.018 and p=0.019 respectively). The Detsky score predicted the length of stay in the intensive care unit (p=0.008). Mid-term (30-month) survival was predicted by the anaerobic threshold (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CPET provided the only means in this study of predicting both 30-day outcome and 30-month mortality. CPET could therefore become an increasingly important tool in determining the optimum management for AAA patients.

Doctors' knowledge of radiation -- a two-centre study and historical comparison.

AIM: To investigate knowledge of the use of ionizing radiation in 2010 and whether there has been any change in this knowledge since the study was first undertaken over 7 years ago. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In both studies a single chest x-ray was classed as one unit of radiation. Doctors from all grades were asked to evaluate the average radiation dose incurred with 13 commonly undertaken radiological procedures, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), etc. Answers within 20% of the actual dose were marked as correct. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two questionnaires were completed (130 in 2003; 112 in 2010). Equal numbers of juniors, middle grades, and consultants were questioned, and scores were comparable (23.3% in 2003; 29.4% in 2010). The majority of doctors (92% in 2003; 86% in 2010) correctly noted that ultrasound and MRI involve no radiation. Doctors underestimated the radiation doses of all investigations by a smaller margin in 2010 compared to 2003 (i.e., more accurately), with only one exception: CT of the abdomen. CONCLUSION: Despite evidence of some improvement, doctors of all grades still have a very poor knowledge of radiation exposure even with the most common investigations. The worsening appreciation of the radiation involved in CT scanning is especially worrying considering its increasing use in practice today.

Five-year retrograde transpopliteal angioplasty results compared with antegrade angioplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Retrograde transpopliteal angioplasty (PA) is a potentially useful alternative technique for endovascular treatment of infra-inguinal arterial disease when antegrade transfemoral puncture (FA) is technically not possible or appropriate. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of PA compared with FA during a 5-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to assess 88 PA and 275 FA performed between January 2003 and January 2008. Assessments of patients, indication for procedure, disease site, stenosis severity, procedure outcomes and time to further intervention were recorded. RESULTS: FA was used to treat more patients with critical ischaemia (42.2% vs 30.7%; P = 0.014)). PA was used to treat more proximal superficial femoral lesions (P < 0.001) and occlusive lesions (P = 0.001). Overall, 84.1% of PA and 82.5 % of FA were technically successful. There was no difference in local puncture site complication rates. Significantly more FA resulted in distal thrombus/embolism (8.4% vs 3.4%; P = 0.044). Further intervention was required in 27.3% of PA and 36.0% of FA. The time interval to re-intervention was not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PA is safe with comparable success rates and long-term outcomes to an FA. PA is a useful alternative approach for treating occlusive, proximal disease.

Appendicectomy deferred to a CEPOD list: the patients' opinion.

AIMS: Implementation of NCEPOD guidelines to avoid out-of-hours operating, Junior doctors' 'New Deal' and EWTD have significantly altered surgical practice. Patients admitted 'out of hours', who need an emergency procedure, are often deferred until the next day. We have attempted to assess patients' opinions of this management plan. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted with uncomplicated appendicitis and operation deferred to the next day according to NCEPOD guidelines were studied. A surgeon, other than the one carrying out the initial assessment, performed the operation on a scheduled morning emergency list. A full explanation was given to patients regarding reasons for deferring operation, and they found out that a different surgeon would be performing their operation. Patients completed a questionnaire post-operatively. RESULTS: 42 patients were studied; median age 24 years (range 17-69); 32 men, 10 women. Thirty presented after 6 p.m. and eight after midnight. The remaining four were admitted during the day. Only one third of the patients recalled reasons for deferred operation with seven not remembering being given an explanation. Two thirds (n=27) of the patients slept poorly pre-operatively, principally due to pain (17) and ward noise (10). Operation on the same night as their admission was the preferred option in 24 patients. All of these slept poorly. Some 22 patients would have preferred the admitting surgeon to have performed their operation; 16 expressed no preference. Only four patients preferred a 'new' surgeon the following day. Of the 42 patients, 28 did not know who had performed their operation. CONCLUSION: Despite being told why their operation was delayed most patients would prefer not to have their procedure delayed. Lack of sleep pre-operatively is a major determinant of patient opinion. Few patients wanted a 'new' surgeon to perform their operation.

Continuity of care of emergency surgical admissions: impact on SpR training.

INTRODUCTION: Continuity of patient care is an important component of surgical education. This study assesses continuity of care in the current working climate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on consecutive emergency general surgical admissions during one month. Our SpR rota is a partial shift 24 hour on call with the SpR's own consultant. The SpR is free of commitments the next day following post-take work. The on call general surgery SpR was designated the 'assessor'. Data were analysed according to involvement of the 'assessor' at subsequent stages of the admission--consent, operation, review during admission and review on discharge. Data were also collected defining whether the 'assessor' and operator followed-up the patient. RESULTS: There were 200 admissions; 108 female and 92 male. Overall 23% admissions had the same 'assessor' for all stages of patient care. The 'assessor' dealt with an aspect of patient care in 11% of admissions who underwent an operation and 29% of admissions who were conservatively managed. SpR follow-up of admissions on whom they operated was 70% but only 41% of admissions who were conservatively managed were followed-up by the assessing SpR. CONCLUSION: Complete in-hospital continuity of care was poor, although SpR follow-up of patients on whom they had operated was better. Introduction of shift patterns has reduced continuity of patient care. This will have a negative impact on both surgical training and patient care.

Prioritisation of vascular outpatient appointments cannot be based on referral letters alone.

BACKGROUND: Vascular referrals include patients with conditions varying from varicose veins of cosmetic nuisance to patients with critical ischaemia, transient ischaemic attacks and abdominal aortic aneurysms. A large number of such referrals are received each week from general practitioners. It is important to prioritise patients with conditions that need to be dealt with quickly. OBJECTIVE: We prospectively reviewed referral letters to two vascular units, one in South Wales and one in the Oxford region to assess whether prioritisation can be made on the basis of referral letters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All GP referral letters were studied for four months. Only patients with lower limb ischaemic symptoms were included. Degree of urgency requested by the GP was also noted. RESULTS: Of 174 referrals for potential lower limb ischaemia analysed, 145 (83%) proved to be due to peripheral vascular disease. Of these 145 referrals, 72% were referred for claudication. Only 37% and 13% respectively mentioned claudication distance and/or rest pain. Risk factors with reference to diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease and smoking were made in 19%, 43%, 23%, 23%, 10%, 14%, 31% of letters respectively. Clinical signs were poorly documented, with 90% of referrals failing to mention presence or absence of critical ischaemic signs. The GP's own assessment of urgency was not stated in 66% of letters, without which only 3% of patients were seen in the clinic within four weeks, compared with 22% in those in whom urgency was stated. Six per cent of patients when reviewed in outpatients were found to have sufficiently severe symptoms to warrant immediate admission. Regional variation was observed with 57% of Royal Glamorgan Hospital referral letters documenting degree of urgency compared with only 23% of Royal Berkshire Hospital letters (p = < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Most referral letters were poorly documented with regard to key symptoms, risk factors and clinical signs. The degree of urgency was often not stated. The creation of referral protocols is now being considered.

Management of cardiovascular risk factors by primary care physicians in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) are now intensively treated by primary care physicians predominantly because of government pressure and remuneration to prescribe anti-platelet and anti-hyperlipidaemic drugs. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with the identical risk factors appeared to us to be less intensively investigated and treated by primary care physicians. OBJECTIVE: To review the treatment of risk factors in all patients referred to two vascular clinics with a diagnosis of suspected PAD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Vascular outpatient clinic in two district general hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 124 consecutive new patients were studied to determine risk factors and appropriate treatment. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients, 85 (68%) were confirmed to have PAD without evidence of symptomatic CAD. In the PAD alone group, less than 25% received anti-smoking advice (p < 0.0001) and only 36% were prescribed anti-platelet drugs (p = 0.016). Seventy-three per cent of the overall referred patients with hypertension had been treated for this condition and the blood pressure was normal in 71% of the patients with PAD. In patients with hyperlipidaemia, statins had been prescribed in 92% of patients with coexistent symptomatic CAD, but only in 64% of patients with PAD alone (p = 0.009). In the patients with diabetes, only 66% of the PAD alone group had adequate control of their blood sugar (p = 0.185). CONCLUSIONS: It would appear that patients with CAD and PAD are being treated successfully for their risk factors, but patients with PAD alone, sharing the same common risk factors, are being less than optimally treated.

A meta-analysis of 21,178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared outcomes after elective open and endovascular approaches to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery, with varying results. METHODS: A random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to compare operative outcomes, postoperative complications, 30-day mortality and long-term patient survival after surgery. Endpoints were compared using odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean differences (WMDs) or log hazard ratios (HRs) as appropriate. RESULTS: Forty-two studies comprising 21,178 patients (10,855 open; 10,323 endovascular) were included. In the elective setting (20,715 patients), the endovascular method was associated with a shorter stay in intensive care (WMD--36 h; P < 0.001) and a shorter total postoperative stay (WMD--5.4 days; P < 0.001). Cardiac (OR 1.76; P = 0.002) and respiratory (OR 4.01; P < 0.001) complications were more common after open surgery. In the endovascular group, 30-day mortality was lower (OR 0.46; P < 0.001). Endovascular surgery was also associated with an improved long-term aneurysm-related mortality (HR 0.39; P < 0.001). For ruptured AAA (463 patients), the less invasive operation was associated with a reduced stay in intensive care (WMD--100.4 h; P = 0.005) and a significantly lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.45; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The endovascular repair of AAA offers a clear benefit in terms of reduction in postoperative adverse events and 30-day mortality. In the longer term, it is also associated with a reduction in aneurysm-related mortality, but not in all-cause mortality.

Endovascular and open approaches to non-thrombosed popliteal aneurysm repair: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms is a relatively new technique that is still undergoing evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes following open and endovascular approaches. METHODS: All published studies comparing outcomes following open and endovascular popliteal aneurysm were included. Endpoints included operative duration, length of stay, and postoperative complications including short-term patency rates. Outcomes were combined using a random-effects meta-analytical technique and differences assessed using odds ratios (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD) and log hazards ratio (HR). RESULTS: Three studies comprising 141 patients (37 endovascular; 104 open) were included. No significant differences in patient characteristics were seen. Operative duration was significantly longer for endovascular repair (WMD 120 minutes, p<0.001). Thirty day graft thrombosis (OR 5.05, p=0.06) and reintervention (OR 18.80, p=0.03) were more likely following endovascular repairs. Postoperative length of stay was shorter in the endovascular group (WMD--3.9 days, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in long-term primary patency rates (HR 1.70, p=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms offers similar medium-term benefits as an open repair. However, short-term graft thrombosis and reintervention rates are significantly greater. With the current technology it is difficult to justify endovascular treatment of popliteal aneurysms.

History of the management of popliteal artery aneurysms.

Management of popliteal aneurysms remains controversial. Debate continues as to when an asymptomatic popliteal aneurysm should be treated and, with concerns regarding the fate of a bypassed popliteal aneurysm and the advent of intravascular stents, what procedure is best. This paper reviews the history of popliteal artery aneurysm management with particular emphasis on treatment and results before the modern era of arterial reconstruction. The aim of treatment then was to induce thrombosis. Now it is to prevent thrombosis.

Arterial thrombosis associated with malignant disease.

OBJECTIVE: The association between cancer and venous thrombosis is well established, however, that between malignancy and arterial thrombosis is less well described. Isolated cases have been reported and chemotherapy has been implicated as a cause though its significance compared with the malignant disease process itself is not known. This study examines the outcome of patients with malignant disease who present with arterial thrombosis. METHOD: Details of patients with malignant disease who presented with arterial thrombosis were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty patients presented with malignancy and arterial thrombosis, 16 presented in the last four years. The most common malignancy was metastatic breast cancer. Thrombosis involved the leg in 19 cases and the arm in one. Four patients also had venous thromboembolic events and one had a carotid artery thrombosis. Eight patients underwent operative treatment for their thrombosis. Five out of six thromboembolectomies and two out of three bypass procedures failed. Twelve had conservative or palliative treatment. Outcome was generally poor, two patients had major amputations and seventeen died at median follow-up of eight weeks. Survival rate from the time of presentation of arterial thrombosis was 50% at three months and 17% at one year. CONCLUSION: Patients with critical limb ischaemia due to atherosclerotic disease have an expected survival of approximately 80% at one year. The outcome of patients with arterial thrombosis associated with malignant disease is far worse. Arterial thrombosis is an agonal event in many of these patients. Conservative or palliative treatment may be the most appropriate management.

Reduction in varicose vein services: impact on operative training.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the impact of rationing varicose vein operations on operative training on a general surgical unit with a vascular interest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Log-books of middle-grade surgeons were analysed for 3-month periods before and after a decision by the local Primary Care Trust to ration varicose vein referrals. Number, intermediate equivalents and type of operations were recorded, whether they were general or vascular cases and whether the trainee had carried out or assisted with the operation. RESULTS: There was a slight fall in the total number of operations in which the middle-grade surgeons were involved (208 to 186). There was a significant increase in general surgical cases with the fall in number of varicose vein operations (P < 0.0001). The fall in case-load and work-load operative training in vascular surgery was compensated by an increase in general surgical cases (P = 0.0003). This was largely due to increased number of hernia repairs (P = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS: From the point of operative training, a vascular unit in a district general hospital would not be sustainable following withdrawal of varicose vein services. However, this can be off-set by increasing general surgical case-load to fill the gap created.

Vascular surgery within general surgery: an analysis of workload 1989-2005.

INTRODUCTION: There is considerable debate as to whether vascular surgery should be a subspecialty separate from general surgery. This study examines the changing relationship between general and vascular surgery in a district general surgical unit over 16 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A detailed survey of referrals, admissions and operations to one unit was carried out over 3 months in 2003. This was compared with similar surveys in 1989, 1990 and 1995. In addition a 3-month audit of operations performed was carried out in 2005 following a decision by the Primary Care Trust (PCT) to reduce varicose vein referrals. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of varicose vein and arterial referrals 1989-2003 (P = 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). This was reflected in increased number of vascular admissions (P < 0.0001). In 1989, 14% of the arterial cases were admitted as emergencies. This figure rose to 52% in 2003 (P < 0.0001). There was a significant increase in the number of arterial operations performed between 1989 and 1995; however, from 1995 to 2003 this number fell P < 0.0001). The number of varicose vein procedures increased significantly 1989-2003 (P < 0.0001), with a significant fall after the PCT decision (P < 0.0001). However, the number of operations carried out in 2005 increased slightly with the proportion of general surgical cases, mostly hernia repairs and laparoscopic cholecystectomies, increasing. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing specialisation comes the risk that reduction in any aspect of a particular specialty may result in that unit becoming unsustainable. In vascular surgery this will inevitably lead to centralisation of services. In a large district general hospital having two general surgeons with a vascular interest, the general surgical component has maintained the workload of the unit following reduction in varicose vein referrals.

Popliteal aneurysms: from John Hunter to the 21st century.

Popliteal aneurysms are rare and tend to occur in older men with significant co-morbidity. Historically, management of popliteal aneurysms can be considered in three broad groups: (i) the technique of Antyllus; (ii) techniques relying upon a collateral circulation; and (iii) techniques involving maintenance or restoration of circulation. Bypass and exclusion is currently been challenged by endovascular techniques which show promise in selected cases. Current controversies in popliteal aneurysms management are: when to repair asymptomatic aneurysms, what operation to do and how to manage acute thrombosis. These have been addressed by studying, prospectively, 73 patients presenting with 116 popliteal aneurysms. Diameter greater than 2 cm is often stated as being an indication for elective operation in asymptomatic popliteal aneurysms. However, distortion of the aneurysm appears to be at least as important as size in determining whether symptoms are likely to develop. Of 17 popliteal aneurysms followed for a median of 34 months with a diameter 2-3 cm and distortion less than 45 degrees , none thrombosed. This is no worse than patency following elective bypass (P = 0.064). Popliteal aneurysms greater than 3 cm in diameter in patients who are unfit or who declined an operation were significantly more likely to develop thrombosis or any other symptom (P = 0.01 and P = 0.004, respectively). Popliteal aneurysms less than 3 cm in diameter with distortion less than 45 degrees can safely be managed by ultrasound surveillance. Popliteal aneurysms with greater diameter or distortion are best operated upon. Bypass, combined with proximal and distal ligation of the aneurysm, resulted in 5-year graft patency of 78% and 65% for popliteal aneurysms originally patent or thrombosed, respectively, with good long-term exclusion of the aneurysm. In addition to the general complications of intra-arterial thrombolysis, acute deterioration of the limb during lysis appears to be a particular problem when dealing with thrombosed popliteal aneurysms. It occurs in about 13% of cases which compares with 2% when dealing with thrombosed grafts or native arteries. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for thrombosed popliteal aneurysms is associated with unacceptably high numbers of complications and thrombolysis should be reserved for intra-operative use only.

Major groin complications following the use of synthetic grafts.

BACKGROUND: The ideal results of vascular reconstructive surgery include an uncomplicated operation, symptomatic relief, prompt wound healing, rapid return to pre-operative functional status without long term functional consequences. Long term complications are often not emphasized. This study describes false femoral aneurysms (FFA) and infection following use of synthetic graft in the groin. METHODS: All patients under the care of one surgeon, undergoing synthetic graft insertion involving the groin between January 1988 and December 2005 were included. RESULTS: Some 489 patients were included (745 at risk groins). A total of 34 patients developed either FFA or infection, involving 39 groins (5.2%). There were 18 FFA, presenting a median of four years after the original operation. FFA was more common following aortofemoral bypass grafts than femorofemoral or femorodistal bypasses (P=0.0084). Repair with interposition grafting was carried out in 17 cases. There was one death postoperatively. The remainder remained satisfactory at a median follow up of 60 months. Median time from original operation to 21 groin infections presenting was 12 months. Infection was commonest after femorofemoral cross over grafts P=0.023. Four major amputations were carried out. Debridement and sartorius transposition was useful in about half of the cases treated. CONCLUSION: Serious groin complications occur in about 5% of cases following use of a synthetic graft. This can result in significant morbidity long after the original operation has been carried out. Patients need to be made aware of this when obtaining informed consent.

Outcome following bypass, and proximal and distal ligation of popliteal aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe early and late results of proximal and distal ligation for popliteal aneurysm (PA), combined with bypass, with particular reference to the fate of the excluded aneurysm. METHODS: Of a cohort of 116 patients with PAs, 66 were treated with bypass and ligation. Graft patency was determined by duplex surveillance. In addition, 17 patients with bypassed PAs underwent a total of 33 duplex scans to determine flow within the aneurysm and change in size. RESULTS: For initially patent PAs, 3-, 5- and 8-year primary bypass graft patency was 78, 78 and 51 per cent respectively. These rates were not statistically significantly different from those following bypass for thrombosed PA, 3- and 5-year primary patency being 72 and 65 per cent respectively. No PA produced further symptoms after bypass and ligation. No flow was seen in any aneurysm at follow-up. Only one showed an increase in size. CONCLUSION: Proximal and distal ligation with bypass produced satisfactory long-term patency with good exclusion of the PA.

Vascular surgical emergencies: how will future surgeons be trained?

INTRODUCTION: We wished to assess whether pattern and impact of emergency vascular surgical referrals has altered since a previous study in 1990. Following introduction of shift working patterns, we wished to assess how these changes may affect vascular training and vascular on-call cover. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective survey of emergency vascular referrals at two district general hospitals (DGH-R and DGH-L) in 2003. DGH-R received only regional referrals whereas DGH-L also received 'next day' referrals from a smaller hospital. Results were compared between centres and with a previous study undertaken at DGH-R in 1990. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2003 emergency vascular referrals at DGH-R increased by 51% (53 to 80). The number seen at DGH-R and DGH-L were similar in 2003. There were significantly more out-of-hours referrals in DGH-R than DGH-L (59% versus 35%; P = 0.0123). Referrals were more likely to be seen initially by the vascular team at DGH-L than DGH-R (80% versus 47%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular emergency referrals have increased. A trainee was likely to see more emergency referrals at DGH-L than DGH-R. This may impact on future training.

A waiting list to go home: an analysis of delayed discharges from surgical beds.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to analyse patients who were unable to be discharged from a surgical ward despite being surgically fit to leave. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected on all surgical in-patients on a single day. Patients who were surgically fit for discharge but whose discharge was delayed were identified. Demographic data and reasons for delay were noted. RESULTS: Nine of 75 patients (12%) were surgical bed blockers. These patients were more likely to have been admitted as emergencies (P = 0.035) and were older (P < 0.01) than the remaining patients. They occupied 35% of the total 'bed-days' of the group as a whole with a median in-patient stay of 41 days compared with 2 days for the other patients. Trust-collected data, based on UK Government guidelines, showed only one surgical delayed discharge patient on the day studied. CONCLUSIONS: Due to problems in defining delayed discharge Government figures probably underestimate the true numbers. Lack of intermediate care and social service provision are a major cause of bed blocking.